Class 8 Maths NCERT Solutions Chapter 5: Number Play (Ganita Prakash, Part 1) | Boundless Maths
📘 Ganita Prakash · Part 1 · CBSE 2026-27 ✨ Free — No Sign-up 4 Figure it Out Sets

Part I, Chapter 5Number Play

Looking for Class 8 Maths Chapter 5 Number Play NCERT solutions with clear, step-by-step working? This free CBSE 2026-27 Ganita Prakash (Part 1) guide covers everything students search for on this topic — divisibility rules for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 24 explained with reasons (not just tricks), the parity of the sum of consecutive numbers, always/sometimes/never true statements about multiples and factors, how to find the digital root of a number, and how to solve cryptarithm puzzles like cryptarithms with letters for digits. You'll also find the divisibility test for 11 using alternating digit sums, why checking 4 and 6 doesn't confirm divisibility by 24, and full solutions to every Math Talk box, Try This box, and all four Figure it Out exercise sets (pages 122, 126, 131, and 132–134).

Also searched as: Class 8 Number Play notes, Chapter 5 Maths Class 8 extra questions, divisibility rules class 8 PDF, and Ganita Prakash Class 8 Chapter 5 solutions.

32Figure it Out Qs
36Math Talk / In-text Qs
100%NCERT Aligned
Browse All Ganita Prakash Chapters →

Sum of Consecutive Numbers

MTMath Talk — Anshu is exploring sums of consecutive numbers. He has written 7 = 3 + 4; 10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4; 12 = 3 + 4 + 5; 15 = 7 + 8 = 4 + 5 + 6 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5. Now, he is wondering —
(i) “Can I write every natural number as a sum of consecutive numbers?”
(ii) “Which numbers can I write as the sum of consecutive numbers in more than one way?”
(iii) “Ohh, I know all odd numbers can be written as a sum of two consecutive numbers. Can we write all even numbers as a sum of consecutive numbers?”
(iv) “Can I write 0 as a sum of consecutive numbers? Maybe I should use negative numbers.” Explore these questions and any others that may occur to you.

(i) Not every natural number can be written as a sum of two or more consecutive natural numbers.

Checking the numbers from 1 to 70, the only ones that cannot be written are \(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64\).

These are the powers of 2.

All the other numbers can be written, for example \(3 = 1 + 2\), \(5 = 2 + 3\), \(6 = 1 + 2 + 3\), \(7 = 3 + 4\), \(9 = 4 + 5\), \(10 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4\).

(ii) Some numbers can be written in more than one way.

\(9 = 4 + 5 = 2 + 3 + 4\)

\(15 = 7 + 8 = 4 + 5 + 6 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5\)

Numbers that have more odd factors (like 15 or 45) can be written in more ways.

(iii) Many even numbers can be written, but not all.

\(6 = 1 + 2 + 3\), \(12 = 3 + 4 + 5\), \(14 = 2 + 3 + 4 + 5\), \(18 = 5 + 6 + 7\), \(20 = 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6\)

But \(2, 4, 8, 16, \ldots\) cannot be written as a sum of consecutive natural numbers.

(iv) Yes, if we allow negative numbers.

\(0 = (-1) + 0 + 1\) and \(0 = (-2) + (-1) + 0 + 1 + 2\)

With negative numbers, every number can be written.

The numbers from \(-(n-1)\) to \(n-1\) cancel in pairs, leaving \(n\).

For example, \(4 = (-3) + (-2) + (-1) + 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4\).

(i) No: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, … (powers of 2) cannot be written.
(ii) For example 9 and 15 can.
(iii) Not all even numbers.
(iv) Yes, 0 = (−1) + 0 + 1.
MT
Math Talk — Take any 4 consecutive numbers. For example, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Place ‘+’ and ‘–’ signs in between the numbers. How many different possibilities exist? Write all of them. Evaluate each expression and write the result next to it. Do you notice anything interesting? Now, take four other consecutive numbers. Place the ‘+’ and ‘–’ signs as you have done before. Find out the results of each expression. What do you observe? Repeat this for one more set of 4 consecutive numbers. Share your findings. Do these patterns occur no matter which 4 consecutive numbers are chosen? Is there a way to find out through reasoning? Hint: Use algebra and describe the 8 expressions in a general form.
+−+−+−+−+−+−+−3445555666666663 + 4 + 5 + 63 + 4 + 5 − 6

The first number keeps its sign.

Each of the other three numbers can take \(+\) or \(-\).

So there are \(2 \times 2 \times 2 = 8\) possibilities.

The table gives the value of all 8 expressions.

The signs are for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th numbers.

Signs\(3,4,5,6\)\(5,6,7,8\)\(10,11,12,13\)\(n, n+1, n+2, n+3\)
+ + +\(18\)\(26\)\(46\)\(4n + 6\)
+ + −\(6\)\(10\)\(20\)\(2n\)
+ − +\(8\)\(12\)\(22\)\(2n + 2\)
+ − −\(-4\)\(-4\)\(-4\)\(-4\)
− + +\(10\)\(14\)\(24\)\(2n + 4\)
− + −\(-2\)\(-2\)\(-2\)\(-2\)
− − +\(0\)\(0\)\(0\)\(0\)
− − −\(-12\)\(-16\)\(-26\)\(-2n - 6\)

General form: let the numbers be \(n, n+1, n+2, n+3\).

\(n + (n+1) + (n+2) + (n+3) = 4n + 6\)

\(n + (n+1) + (n+2) - (n+3) = 2n\)

\(n + (n+1) - (n+2) + (n+3) = 2n + 2\)

\(n + (n+1) - (n+2) - (n+3) = -4\)

\(n - (n+1) + (n+2) + (n+3) = 2n + 4\)

\(n - (n+1) + (n+2) - (n+3) = -2\)

\(n - (n+1) - (n+2) + (n+3) = 0\)

\(n - (n+1) - (n+2) - (n+3) = -2n - 6\)

Observations: all 8 results are even numbers, for every set of 4 consecutive numbers.

Three of the results do not depend on \(n\) at all: \(-4\), \(-2\) and \(0\).

The other five are \(4n+6,\ 2n,\ 2n+2,\ 2n+4,\ -2n-6\).

Each has a factor 2, so it is even for every whole number \(n\).

There are 8 expressions. For any 4 consecutive numbers, all 8 results are even, and the three results −4, −2 and 0 are the same every time.
MTMath Talk — Now take any 4 numbers, place ‘+’ and ‘–’ signs in the eight different ways, and evaluate the resulting expression. What do you observe about their parities? Repeat this with other sets of 4 numbers. Is there a way to explain why this happens? Hint: Think of the rules for parity of the sum or difference of two numbers.

The table shows the 8 results for two sets of numbers that are not consecutive.

Signs\(2,5,6,9\)\(2,5,6,8\)
+ + +\(22\)\(21\)
+ + −\(4\)\(5\)
+ − +\(10\)\(9\)
+ − −\(-8\)\(-7\)
− + +\(12\)\(11\)
− + −\(-6\)\(-5\)
− − +\(0\)\(-1\)
− − −\(-18\)\(-17\)

For \(2, 5, 6, 9\) all 8 results are even.

For \(2, 5, 6, 8\) all 8 results are odd.

Observation: for any 4 numbers, all 8 results have the same parity.

Why: we know \(\text{odd} \pm \text{odd} = \text{even}\), \(\text{even} \pm \text{even} = \text{even}\) and \(\text{odd} \pm \text{even} = \text{odd}\).

So \(a + b\) and \(a - b\) have the same parity, whatever the parities of \(a\) and \(b\).

In the same way, \(a \pm b + c\) and \(a \pm b - c\) have the same parity.

Continuing, all the expressions \(a \pm b \pm c \pm d\) have the same parity.

For any 4 numbers, all 8 expressions are either all even or all odd, because a + b and a − b always have the same parity.
?In-text Question — Replace any negative sign in the expression \(a + b - c - d\) with a positive sign and find the difference between the two numbers. What do you conclude from this observation?

Replace \(-c\) by \(+c\):

\((a + b + c - d) - (a + b - c - d) = 2c\)

Replace \(-d\) by \(+d\):

\((a + b - c + d) - (a + b - c - d) = 2d\)

Replace both:

\((a + b + c + d) - (a + b - c - d) = 2c + 2d = 2(c + d)\)

Each difference is even.

Conclusion: switching any sign changes the value by an even number (twice the number whose sign is switched).

Two numbers whose difference is even have the same parity.

Starting from any one expression, we can reach all the other 7 by switching one or more signs.

So all 8 expressions have the same parity.

The difference is 2c, 2d or 2(c + d), which is even. So switching signs never changes the parity, and all 8 expressions have the same parity.
?
In-text Question — Explanation 3: This can also be explained using the positive and negative token model you studied in the chapter on Integers. Try to think how.
+−+−+−+−+−+−+−abbccccdddddddd

Represent \(a, b, c, d\) by that many tokens each.

A \(+\) sign means positive tokens, and a \(-\) sign means negative tokens.

The value of the expression is found by cancelling positive tokens against negative tokens.

Each cancelling pair removes 2 tokens.

The total number of tokens at the start is \(a + b + c + d\), whatever the signs are.

Removing pairs (2 at a time) does not change whether this total is odd or even.

So the tokens left over after cancelling have the same parity as \(a + b + c + d\).

The value of the expression is that number of tokens (positive or negative).

Hence every sign choice gives an answer with the same parity as \(a + b + c + d\).

Cancelling tokens in pairs removes an even number of tokens, so every expression has the same parity as a + b + c + d.
?In-text Question — Is the phenomenon of all the expressions having the same parity limited to taking 4 numbers? What do you think?

No.

It happens for any number of terms.

Switching the sign of any one term changes the value by twice that term, which is even.

So all the expressions \(a \pm b \pm c \pm \cdots\) have the same parity as \(a + b + c + \cdots\).

Example with 3 numbers: \(5 + 6 + 7 = 18\), \(5 + 6 - 7 = 4\), \(5 - 6 + 7 = 6\), \(5 - 6 - 7 = -8\).

All four results are even, as predicted.

No, it is true for any number of terms.

Breaking Even

?In-text Question — We know how to identify even numbers. Without computing them, find out which of the following arithmetic expressions are even. 43 + 37; 672 – 348; 4 × 347 × 3; 708 – 477; 809 + 214; 119 × 303; 543 – 479; 513³

\(43 + 37\): odd + odd = even.

Even.

\(672 - 348\): even − even = even.

Even.

\(4 \times 347 \times 3\): it has the even factor 4.

Even.

\(708 - 477\): even − odd = odd.

Not even.

\(809 + 214\): odd + even = odd.

Not even.

\(119 \times 303\): odd × odd = odd.

Not even.

\(543 - 479\): odd − odd = even.

Even.

\(513^3 = 513 \times 513 \times 513\): odd × odd × odd = odd.

Not even.

Even: 43 + 37, 672 – 348, 4 × 347 × 3, 543 – 479. Not even: 708 – 477, 809 + 214, 119 × 303, 513³.
?In-text Question — Using our understanding of how parity behaves under different operations, identify which of the following algebraic expressions give an even number for any integer values for the letter-numbers. 2a + 2b; 3g + 5h; 4m + 2n; 2u – 4v; 13k – 5k; 6m – 3n; x² + 2; b² + 1; 4k × 3j. Write a couple of examples and non-examples, as appropriate, for each expression.

\(2a + 2b = 2(a + b)\): 2 is a factor, so it is always even.

Example: \(a = 3, b = 4\) gives 14.

\(3g + 5h\): not always even.

\(g = 1, h = 1\) gives 8 (even).

\(g = 1, h = 2\) gives 13 (odd).

\(4m + 2n = 2(2m + n)\): always even.

Example: \(m = 4, n = -9\) gives \(-2\).

\(2u - 4v = 2(u - 2v)\): always even.

Example: \(u = 5, v = 3\) gives \(-2\).

\(13k - 5k = 8k\): always even.

Example: \(k = 3\) gives 24.

\(6m - 3n = 3(2m - n)\): not always even.

\(m = 1, n = 2\) gives 0 (even).

\(m = 1, n = 1\) gives 3 (odd).

\(x^2 + 2\): not always even.

\(x = 6\) gives 38 (even).

\(x = 3\) gives 11 (odd).

\(b^2 + 1\): not always even.

\(b = 3\) gives 10 (even).

\(b = 2\) gives 5 (odd).

\(4k \times 3j = 12kj\): 12 is a factor, so it is always even.

Example: \(k = 1, j = 5\) gives 60.

Always even: 2a + 2b, 4m + 2n, 2u – 4v, 13k – 5k, 4k × 3j. Not always even: 3g + 5h, 6m – 3n, x² + 2, b² + 1.
?In-text Question — Write a few algebraic expressions which always give an even number.

An expression is always even if it has 2 as a factor.

Some examples:

\(2p\)

\(6p + 4q = 2(3p + 2q)\)

\(10m - 8n = 2(5m - 4n)\)

\(8a \times b = 2(4ab)\)

\(x^2 + x = x(x + 1)\), the product of two consecutive numbers, since one of them is even.

For example, 2p, 6p + 4q, 10m – 8n, 8ab and x(x + 1).

Pairs to Make Fours

?
In-text Question — Take a pair of even numbers. Add them. Is the sum divisible by 4? Try this with different pairs of even numbers. When is the sum a multiple of 4, and when is it not? Is there a general rule or a pattern? Even numbers can be of two types based on the remainders they leave when divided by 4.
Multiple of 4(remainder 0)Not a multiple of 4(remainder 2)

An even number leaves remainder 0 or 2 when divided by 4.

So an even number is either \(4p\) (a multiple of 4) or \(4q + 2\) (not a multiple of 4).

Trying some pairs:

\(4 + 8 = 12\), a multiple of 4.

\(2 + 6 = 8\) and \(6 + 10 = 16\), multiples of 4.

\(4 + 6 = 10\), \(8 + 2 = 10\) and \(12 + 14 = 26\), not multiples of 4.

Case 1: both are multiples of 4.

\(4p + 4q = 4(p + q)\)

The sum is a multiple of 4.

Case 2: both leave remainder 2.

\((4p + 2) + (4q + 2) = 4p + 4q + 4 = 4(p + q + 1)\)

The sum is a multiple of 4.

Case 3: one is a multiple of 4 and the other leaves remainder 2.

\(4p + (4q + 2) = 4(p + q) + 2\)

The sum leaves remainder 2, so it is not a multiple of 4.

The sum of two even numbers is a multiple of 4 when both leave the same remainder on division by 4 (both 0 or both 2). It is not a multiple of 4 when one leaves remainder 0 and the other leaves remainder 2.
?
In-text Question — What happens when we add a multiple of 4 to an even number that is not a multiple of 4? Is it similar to the case of the parity of the sum of an even and an odd number? Look at the expressions 4p and (4q + 2) and the visualisation. Write the corresponding explanation and examples.
p rows+q rows4p4q + 2=(p + q) rowswith a remainder 2

A multiple of 4 is \(4p\).

An even number that is not a multiple of 4 leaves remainder 2, so it is \(4q + 2\).

\(4p + (4q + 2)\)

\(= 4p + 4q + 2\)

\(= 4(p + q) + 2\)

Visualisation: \(p\) rows of 4 and \(q\) rows of 4 (with 2 extra) join to make \((p + q)\) rows of 4, and the 2 extra counters are left over.

So the sum always leaves a remainder 2 when divided by 4.

It is never a multiple of 4.

Examples: \(4 + 6 = 10\), \(8 + 2 = 10\), \(12 + 10 = 22\), \(16 + 14 = 30\).

Each leaves remainder 2 on division by 4.

Comparison: yes, it is similar to even + odd.

An even number plus an odd number is never even.

A multiple of 4 plus an even number that is not a multiple of 4 is never a multiple of 4.

4p + (4q + 2) = 4(p + q) + 2, which leaves remainder 2 on division by 4. It is never a multiple of 4.

Always, Sometimes, or Never

?In-text Question — If 8 exactly divides two numbers separately, it must exactly divide their sum. Statement 1 is always true. Determine if it is true with subtraction.

Let the two numbers be \(8a\) and \(8b\), both multiples of 8.

\(8a - 8b = 8(a - b)\)

8 is a factor of the difference, so the difference is a multiple of 8.

Visually: take \(b\) rows of 8 away from \(a\) rows of 8.

(a − b) rows leftb rows taken awaya rows of 8 − b rows of 8

\((a - b)\) rows of 8 are left, so the difference is a multiple of 8.

Examples: \(56 - 16 = 40 = 8 \times 5\), \(120 - 80 = 40\), \(16 - 56 = -40 = 8 \times (-5)\).

Yes. If 8 divides two numbers, it divides their difference too, since 8a − 8b = 8(a − b).
MTMath Talk — Examine each of the following statements, and determine whether it is ‘Always true’, ‘Sometimes true’, ‘Never true’. 6. If a number is divisible by both 9 and 4, it must be divisible by 36. 7. If a number is divisible by both 6 and 4, it must be divisible by 24.

Statement 6: Always true.

A number divisible by both 9 and 4 is divisible by \(\text{LCM}(9, 4)\).

9 and 4 have no common factor, so \(\text{LCM}(9, 4) = 9 \times 4 = 36\).

Examples: 36, 72, 108 are divisible by 9 and 4, and also by 36.

Statement 7: Sometimes true.

A number divisible by both 6 and 4 is divisible by \(\text{LCM}(6, 4) = 12\), not necessarily by 24.

Example (true): 24 and 48 are divisible by 6, 4 and 24.

Non-example: 12 and 36 are divisible by both 6 and 4, but not by 24.

Statement 6: Always true. Statement 7: Sometimes true.

What Remains?

?In-text Question — Find a number that has a remainder of 3 when divided by 5. Write more such numbers. Which algebraic expression(s) capture all such numbers?
(i) 3k + 5
(ii) 3k – 5
(iii) 3k/5
(iv) 5k + 3
(v) 5k – 2
(vi) 5k – 3

\(3\) leaves remainder 3 on division by 5.

More such numbers are \(8, 13, 18, 23, 28, \ldots\)

These are 3 more than a multiple of 5.

Testing each expression:

(i) \(3k + 5\): \(k = 2\) gives 11, which leaves remainder 1.

No.

(ii) \(3k - 5\): \(k = 3\) gives 4, which leaves remainder 4.

No.

(iii) \(\frac{3k}{5}\): \(k = 1\) gives \(0.6\), not even a whole number.

No.

(iv) \(5k + 3\): \(k = 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) gives \(3, 8, 13, 18, \ldots\) Yes.

k rows of 5+ 3 extra dots5k + 3

The picture shows \(k\) full rows of 5 and 3 extra counters, which is \(5k + 3\).

(v) \(5k - 2 = 5(k - 1) + 3\): \(k = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) gives \(3, 8, 13, \ldots\) Yes.

(vi) \(5k - 3 = 5(k - 1) + 2\): it leaves remainder 2, for example \(k = 2\) gives 7.

No.

(iv) 5k + 3 and
(v) 5k – 2.
?In-text Question — Are there other expressions that generate numbers that are 3 more than a multiple of 5?

Yes.

If we add or subtract any multiple of 5 to \(5k + 3\), the remainder is still 3.

\(5k + 8 = 5(k + 1) + 3\)

\(5k + 13 = 5(k + 2) + 3\)

\(5k - 7 = 5(k - 2) + 3\)

In general, \(5k + 3 + 5m = 5(k + m) + 3\) for any whole number \(m\).

Example: \(5k + 8\) with \(k = 0, 1, 2, 3\) gives \(8, 13, 18, 23\).

Yes, for example 5k + 8, 5k + 13 and 5k – 7.

Figure it Out — Set 1 (Page 122)

Eight questions from page 122 and page 123 of the textbook.

1The sum of four consecutive numbers is 34. What are these numbers?

Let the four consecutive numbers be \(n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3\).

\(n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) + (n + 3) = 34\)

\(4n + 6 = 34\)

\(4n = 28\)

\(n = 7\)

The numbers are \(7, 8, 9, 10\).

Check: \(7 + 8 + 9 + 10 = 34\)

7, 8, 9 and 10
2Suppose p is the greatest of five consecutive numbers. Describe the other four numbers in terms of p.

The numbers are consecutive, so each is 1 less than the next.

The greatest is \(p\).

The next one down is \(p - 1\).

Then \(p - 2\), \(p - 3\) and \(p - 4\).

The other four numbers are p – 1, p – 2, p – 3 and p – 4.
3For each statement below, determine whether it is always true, sometimes true, or never true. Explain your answer. Mention examples and non-examples as appropriate. Justify your claim using algebra.
(i) The sum of two even numbers is a multiple of 3.
(ii) If a number is not divisible by 18, then it is also not divisible by 9.
(iii) If two numbers are not divisible by 6, then their sum is not divisible by 6.
(iv) The sum of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 9 is a multiple of 3.
(v) The sum of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 3 is a multiple of 9.

(i) Sometimes true.

Two even numbers are \(2a\) and \(2b\).

Their sum is \(2(a + b)\).

This is a multiple of 3 only when \(a + b\) is a multiple of 3.

Example: \(2 + 4 = 6\) and \(4 + 8 = 12\) are multiples of 3.

Non-example: \(2 + 6 = 8\) and \(6 + 8 = 14\) are not.

(ii) Sometimes true.

A multiple of 9 is \(9m\).

It is a multiple of 18 only when \(m\) is even.

So if \(m\) is odd, the number is divisible by 9 but not by 18.

Example (statement true): 30 is not divisible by 18, and it is not divisible by 9.

Non-example: 27 is not divisible by 18, but it is divisible by 9.

(iii) Sometimes true.

Let the numbers be \(6a + r\) and \(6b + s\), where \(r, s\) are remainders from 1 to 5.

Their sum is \(6(a + b) + (r + s)\).

The sum is divisible by 6 only if \(r + s = 6\).

Example (statement true): \(9 + 11 = 20\) is not divisible by 6.

Non-example: \(8 + 10 = 18\) is divisible by 6 (remainders 2 and 4).

(iv) Always true.

A multiple of 6 is \(6x\) and a multiple of 9 is \(9y\).

\(6x + 9y = 3(2x + 3y)\)

3 is a factor, so the sum is a multiple of 3.

Example: \(12 + 18 = 30\).

(v) Sometimes true.

A multiple of 6 is \(6x\) and a multiple of 3 is \(3y\).

Their sum is \(6x + 3y = 3(2x + y)\).

This is a multiple of 9 only when \(2x + y\) is a multiple of 3.

Example: \(18 + 9 = 27\) is a multiple of 9.

Non-example: \(12 + 9 = 21\) is not a multiple of 9.

(i) Sometimes true
(ii) Sometimes true
(iii) Sometimes true
(iv) Always true
(v) Sometimes true
4Find a few numbers that leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 3 and a remainder of 2 when divided by 4. Write an algebraic expression to describe all such numbers.

Let the number be \(x\).

Then \(x = 3a + 2\) and \(x = 4b + 2\).

\(x - 2 = 3a\) and \(x - 2 = 4b\)

So \(x - 2\) is a multiple of both 3 and 4.

It is a multiple of \(\text{LCM}(3, 4) = 12\).

\(x - 2 = 12n\)

\(x = 12n + 2\)

Numbers: \(n = 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\) gives \(2, 14, 26, 38, 50, \ldots\)

Check: \(14 = 3 \times 4 + 2 = 4 \times 3 + 2\)

The numbers are 2, 14, 26, 38, … All such numbers are given by 12n + 2.
5“I hold some pebbles, not too many, When I group them in 3’s, one stays with me. Try pairing them up — it simply won’t do, A stubborn odd pebble remains in my view. Group them by 5, yet one’s still around, But grouping by seven, perfection is found. More than one hundred would be far too bold, Can you tell me the number of pebbles I hold?”

Grouped in 3s, remainder 1.

Paired (groups of 2), remainder 1.

Grouped in 5s, remainder 1.

So the number is 1 more than a multiple of 3, of 2 and of 5.

The number minus 1 is a multiple of \(\text{LCM}(2, 3, 5) = 30\).

The number is \(30k + 1\).

The number is not more than 100, so it is \(31, 61\) or \(91\).

Grouping by 7 leaves no remainder.

\(31 = 7 \times 4 + 3\) (no)

\(61 = 7 \times 8 + 5\) (no)

\(91 = 7 \times 13\) (yes)

91 pebbles
6Tathagat has written several numbers that leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 6. He claims, “If you add any three such numbers, the sum will always be a multiple of 6.” Is Tathagat’s claim true?

Let the three numbers be \(6a + 2\), \(6b + 2\) and \(6c + 2\).

Sum \(= (6a + 2) + (6b + 2) + (6c + 2)\)

\(= 6a + 6b + 6c + 6\)

\(= 6(a + b + c + 1)\)

This is a multiple of 6.

Example: \(2 + 8 + 14 = 24 = 6 \times 4\).

Yes, Tathagat’s claim is true: the sum is 6(a + b + c + 1).
7When divided by 7, the number 661 leaves a remainder of 3, and 4779 leaves a remainder of 5. Without calculating, can you say what remainders the following expressions will leave when divided by 7? Show the solution both algebraically and visually.
(i) 4779 + 661
(ii) 4779 – 661

Write \(4779 = 7p + 5\) and \(661 = 7q + 3\).

(i) Algebraically:

\(4779 + 661 = (7p + 5) + (7q + 3)\)

\(= 7p + 7q + 8\)

\(= 7(p + q + 1) + 1\) (since \(8 = 7 + 1\))

The remainder is 1.

(ii) Algebraically:

\(4779 - 661 = (7p + 5) - (7q + 3)\)

\(= 7(p - q) + 2\)

The remainder is 2.

Visually: arrange the counters in rows of 7.

The figure shows 4779 as \(p\) rows with 5 left over, and 661 as \(q\) rows with 3 left over.

4779 = 7p + 5661 = 7q + 3+Sum: (p + q) rows and 5 + 3 = 8 left= (p + q + 1) rows and 1 leftDifference 4779 − 661(p − q) rows and 5 − 3 = 2 leftBlue and teal rows are full rows of 7; orange counters are the remainders. Shown for p = 3, q = 2.
Rows of 7 counters; the orange counters are the remainders

Adding: the full rows add up to \((p + q)\) rows.

The leftover counters add up to \(5 + 3 = 8\).

8 counters make one more row of 7, with 1 counter left over.

Subtracting: remove \(q\) full rows and 3 of the leftover counters.

We get \((p - q)\) rows and \(5 - 3 = 2\) counters left over.

(i) Remainder 1
(ii) Remainder 2
8Find a number that leaves a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, a remainder of 3 when divided by 4, and a remainder of 4 when divided by 5. What is the smallest such number? Can you give a simple explanation of why it is the smallest?

In each case the remainder is 1 less than the divisor.

So if we add 1 to the number, it becomes a multiple of 3, of 4 and of 5.

The number plus 1 is a multiple of \(\text{LCM}(3, 4, 5) = 60\).

The number is \(60k - 1\) for \(k = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\)

The numbers are \(59, 119, 179, \ldots\)

Why 59 is the smallest: the smallest positive multiple of 3, 4 and 5 together is 60.

Taking 1 less than it gives 59.

A smaller multiple would be 0, which gives \(-1\), not a natural number.

Check: \(59 = 3 \times 19 + 2 = 4 \times 14 + 3 = 5 \times 11 + 4\)

59 is the smallest such number. All such numbers are 60k – 1.

Divisibility by 2, 4, 5, 8 and 10

?In-text Question — Similarly, explain using algebra why the divisibility shortcuts for 5, 2, 4, and 8 work.

Write the number as \(\ldots + 1000d + 100c + 10b + a\), where \(a, b, c, d\) are the units, tens, hundreds and thousands digits.

Divisibility by 2 and 5:

\(10b, 100c, 1000d, \ldots\) are all multiples of 10.

So each of them is a multiple of 2 and of 5.

The number is divisible by 2 exactly when \(a\) is divisible by 2, that is, when the units digit is 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8.

The number is divisible by 5 exactly when \(a\) is divisible by 5, that is, when the units digit is 0 or 5.

Divisibility by 4:

\(100 = 4 \times 25\), so \(100c, 1000d, \ldots\) are all multiples of 4.

The number is divisible by 4 exactly when \(10b + a\) is divisible by 4.

That is, when the number formed by the last two digits is divisible by 4.

Divisibility by 8:

\(1000 = 8 \times 125\), so \(1000d, 10000e, \ldots\) are all multiples of 8.

The number is divisible by 8 exactly when \(100c + 10b + a\) is divisible by 8.

That is, when the number formed by the last three digits is divisible by 8.

2 and 5 depend on the units digit, 4 on the last two digits, and 8 on the last three digits, because all the higher place values are multiples of 10, 100 and 1000 respectively.

Divisibility by 9

?In-text Question — Look at each of the following statements. Which are correct and why?
(i) If a number is divisible by 9, then the sum of its digits is divisible by 9.
(ii) If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 9.
(iii) If a number is not divisible by 9, then the sum of its digits is not divisible by 9.
(iv) If the sum of the digits of a number is not divisible by 9, then the number is not divisible by 9.

Every place value is 1 more than a multiple of 9: \(10 = 9 + 1\), \(100 = 99 + 1\), \(1000 = 999 + 1\), and so on.

So for any number, \(\text{number} = (\text{a multiple of } 9) + (\text{sum of its digits})\).

For example, \(7309 = (7 \times 999 + 3 \times 99 + 0 \times 9) + (7 + 3 + 0 + 9)\).

This means a number and the sum of its digits leave the same remainder when divided by 9.

(i) Correct.

If the number is divisible by 9, its remainder is 0.

So the digit sum has remainder 0 too.

(ii) Correct.

If the digit sum is divisible by 9, the number has remainder 0.

So it is divisible by 9.

(iii) Correct.

If the number is not divisible by 9, its remainder is not 0.

So the digit sum has the same non-zero remainder.

(iv) Correct.

If the digit sum is not divisible by 9, the number leaves the same non-zero remainder.

So it is not divisible by 9.

All four statements are correct, because a number and its digit sum leave the same remainder when divided by 9.

Figure it Out — Set 2 (Page 126)

Four questions from page 126 of the textbook.

1Find, without dividing, whether the following numbers are divisible by 9.
(i) 123
(ii) 405
(iii) 8888
(iv) 93547
(v) 358095

A number is divisible by 9 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9.

(i) 123: digit sum \(1+2+3 = 6\).

6 is not a multiple of 9, so not divisible.

(ii) 405: digit sum \(4+0+5 = 9\).

9 is a multiple of 9, so divisible by 9.

(iii) 8888: digit sum \(8+8+8+8 = 32\).

32 is not a multiple of 9, so not divisible.

(iv) 93547: digit sum \(9+3+5+4+7 = 28\).

28 is not a multiple of 9, so not divisible.

(v) 358095: digit sum \(3+5+8+0+9+5 = 30\).

30 is not a multiple of 9, so not divisible.

Only 405 in (ii) is divisible by 9.
2Find the smallest multiple of 9 with no odd digits.

The digits allowed are 0, 2, 4, 6, 8.

The digit sum must be a multiple of 9.

A sum of even digits is always even.

So the digit sum must be an even multiple of 9, that is 18, 36, \(\ldots\) (the sum 0 gives only the number 0).

The smallest possible digit sum is 18.

Number of digits: two even digits add up to at most \(8 + 8 = 16\), which is less than 18.

So we need at least 3 digits.

Smallest 3-digit number: make the hundreds digit as small as possible.

The other two digits add up to at most 16, so the hundreds digit is at least \(18 - 16 = 2\).

Take hundreds digit 2.

The other two digits must add up to 16, so both are 8.

The number is 288.

Check: \(288 = 9 \times 32\).

The smallest multiple of 9 with no odd digits is 288.
3Find the multiple of 9 that is closest to the number 6000.

Digit sum of 6000 is 6.

So 6000 is 6 more than a multiple of 9.

The multiple of 9 just below 6000 is \(6000 - 6 = 5994\).

The multiple of 9 just above 6000 is \(5994 + 9 = 6003\).

Distance of 5994 from 6000 is 6.

Distance of 6003 from 6000 is 3.

3 is smaller than 6.

6003 is the multiple of 9 closest to 6000.
4How many multiples of 9 are there between the numbers 4300 and 4400?

Digit sum of 4300 is 7.

So 4300 is 7 more than a multiple of 9.

The first multiple of 9 above 4300 is \(4300 + 2 = 4302\), since \(7 + 2 = 9\).

Digit sum of 4400 is 8.

So 4400 is 8 more than a multiple of 9.

The last multiple of 9 below 4400 is \(4400 - 8 = 4392\).

\(4302 = 9 \times 478\) and \(4392 = 9 \times 488\).

The multiples are \(9 \times 478, 9 \times 479, \ldots, 9 \times 488\).

Number of multiples \(= 488 - 478 + 1 = 11\).

There are 11 multiples of 9 between 4300 and 4400.

Divisibility by 3

?In-text Question — The shortcut to find the divisibility by 3 is similar to the method for 9. A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. Explore the remainders when powers of 10 are divided by 3. Explain why this method works.

Remainders of powers of 10 on division by 3:

\(10 = 9 + 1 = 3 \times 3 + 1\), remainder 1.

\(100 = 99 + 1 = 3 \times 33 + 1\), remainder 1.

\(1000 = 999 + 1 = 3 \times 333 + 1\), remainder 1.

In general, \(10^k = 99\ldots9 + 1\), and \(99\ldots9\) is a multiple of 9, so it is also a multiple of 3.

So every power of 10 leaves remainder 1 when divided by 3.

Why the method works: take the number \(\ldots + 1000d + 100c + 10b + a\).

Write each place value as (multiple of 3) + 1:

\(= d(999 + 1) + c(99 + 1) + b(9 + 1) + a\)

\(= (999d + 99c + 9b) + (d + c + b + a)\)

The first bracket is a multiple of 3 (it is even a multiple of 9).

So the number leaves the same remainder as the sum of its digits \(d + c + b + a\) when divided by 3.

Example: \(7309\) has digit sum 19.

\(19 = 3 \times 6 + 1\), so 7309 leaves remainder 1 when divided by 3.

A number is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3, because every power of 10 is 1 more than a multiple of 3.

Divisibility by 11

MT
Math Talk — Using these observations, can you tell whether the number 462 is divisible by 11? What could be a general method or shortcut to check divisibility by 11?
PlaceMultiple of 11In terms of 11Remark
Units place (1)11 × 0 = 01 = 11 × 0 + 11 is one more than a multiple of 11
Tens place (10)11 × 1 = 1110 = 11 × 1 − 110 is one less than a multiple of 11
Hundreds place (100)11 × 9 = 99100 = 11 × 9 + 1100 is one more than a multiple of 11
Thousands place (1000)11 × 91 = 10011000 = 11 × 91 − 11000 is one less than a multiple of 11

The place values alternate: units is 1 more than a multiple of 11, tens is 1 less, hundreds is 1 more, thousands is 1 less, and so on.

For 462:

4 hundreds: 400 is 4 more than a multiple of 11.

6 tens: 60 is 6 less than a multiple of 11.

2 units: 2 is 2 more than a multiple of 11.

So 462 is (multiple of 11) \(+ 4 - 6 + 2\) = (multiple of 11) \(+ 0\).

Check: \(462 = 11 \times 42\).

General method:

Add the digits in the units, hundreds, ten-thousands, \(\ldots\) places (the places that are 1 more than a multiple of 11).

Add the digits in the tens, thousands, \(\ldots\) places (the places that are 1 less).

Subtract the second sum from the first.

If the difference is 0 or a multiple of 11, the number is divisible by 11.

Yes, 462 is divisible by 11. A number is divisible by 11 if (sum of digits at units, hundreds, … places) − (sum of digits at tens, thousands, … places) is 0 or a multiple of 11.
?In-text Question — If this difference is 11 or a multiple of 11, what does that say about the remainder obtained when the number is divided by 11?

The number is (a multiple of 11) \(+\) (the difference).

If the difference is 11, 22, 33, \(\ldots\) (or 0), it is itself a multiple of 11.

So the number is (multiple of 11) \(+\) (multiple of 11) = a multiple of 11.

The remainder is 0, so the number is divisible by 11.
?In-text Question — Using this shortcut, find out whether the following numbers are divisible by 11. Further, find the remainder if the number is not divisible by 11.
(i) 158
(ii) 841
(iii) 481
(iv) 5529
(v) 90904
(vi) 857076

Method: excess = sum of digits at units, hundreds, ten-thousands, \(\ldots\) places.

Short = sum of digits at tens, thousands, \(\ldots\) places.

Remainder = excess − short (add 11 if it is negative).

(i) 158: excess \(8+1 = 9\), short \(5 = 5\), difference \(9 - 5 = 4\).

Remainder 4.

(ii) 841: excess \(1+8 = 9\), short \(4 = 4\), difference \(9 - 4 = 5\).

Remainder 5.

(iii) 481: excess \(1+4 = 5\), short \(8 = 8\), difference \(5 - 8 = -3\).

The number is 3 short of a multiple of 11, so the remainder is \(11 - 3 = 8\).

(iv) 5529: excess \(9+5 = 14\), short \(2+5 = 7\), difference \(14 - 7 = 7\).

Remainder 7.

(v) 90904: excess \(4+9+9 = 22\), short \(0+0 = 0\), difference \(22 - 0 = 22\).

Divisible by 11.

(vi) 857076: excess \(6+0+5 = 11\), short \(7+7+8 = 22\), difference \(11 - 22 = -11\).

Divisible by 11.

(i) Remainder 4
(ii) Remainder 5
(iii) Remainder 8
(iv) Remainder 7
(v) Divisible
(vi) Divisible
?In-text Question — Look at the following procedure — 1. Place alternating ‘+’ and ‘–’ signs before every digit starting from the unit’s digit. 2. Evaluate the expression. 3. The result denotes the remainder obtained when the number is divided by 11. Example for the number 328105: –3 + 2 – 8 + 1 – 0 + 5 = – 3, so 328105 is 3 less than or 8 more than a multiple of 11. Is this method similar to or different from the method we saw just before?

The two methods are the same.

Only the order of work is different.

Earlier method for 328105:

Excess (units, hundreds, ten-thousands): \(5 + 1 + 2 = 8\).

Short (tens, thousands, lakhs): \(0 + 8 + 3 = 11\).

Difference: \(8 - 11 = -3\).

New method for 328105:

The + signs fall on 5, 1, 2 and the − signs fall on 0, 8, 3.

\(-3 + 2 - 8 + 1 - 0 + 5 = (2 + 1 + 5) - (3 + 8 + 0) = 8 - 11 = -3\)

The new method does the adding and subtracting in a single line.

The methods are the same: the + signs fall on the places that are 1 more than a multiple of 11, and the − signs on the places that are 1 less.
MT
Math Talk — Fill in the following table. Find a quick way to do this?
NumberDivisible by
23456891011
128YesNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNo
990         
1586         
275         
6686         
639210         
429714         
2856         
3060         
406839         

Quick way: use the shortcuts instead of dividing.

By 2: the units digit is even.

By 5: the units digit is 0 or 5.

By 10: the units digit is 0.

By 4: the last two digits form a multiple of 4.

By 8: the last three digits form a multiple of 8.

By 3: the digit sum is a multiple of 3.

By 9: the digit sum is a multiple of 9.

By 6: divisible by both 2 and 3.

By 11: (sum of digits at units, hundreds, \(\ldots\)) − (sum of digits at tens, thousands, \(\ldots\)) is 0 or a multiple of 11.

Number23456891011
128YesNoYesNoNoYesNoNoNo
990YesYesNoYesYesNoYesYesYes
1586YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
275NoNoNoYesNoNoNoNoYes
6686YesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
639210YesYesNoYesYesNoNoYesYes
429714YesYesNoNoYesNoYesNoNo
2856YesYesYesNoYesYesNoNoNo
3060YesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNo
406839NoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Book error: the textbook’s example row for 128 shows “No” under 4. But \(128 = 4 \times 32\) (its last two digits, 28, are a multiple of 4), so the correct entry is “Yes”. The row also shows “Yes” under 8, and every multiple of 8 is a multiple of 4. The table above uses the correct entry.
See the table above.

Divisibility by 6 and 24

?In-text Question — How can we find out if a number is divisible by 6? Will checking its divisibility by its factors 2 and 3 work? Use the shortcuts for 2 and 3 on these numbers and divide each number by 6 to verify — 38, 225, 186, 64.

Check each number for 2 (units digit even) and for 3 (digit sum a multiple of 3).

38: units digit 8 is even.

Digit sum \(3 + 8 = 11\) is not a multiple of 3.

Not divisible by 6.

Check: \(38 = 6 \times 6 + 2\).

225: units digit 5 is odd, so not divisible by 2.

Digit sum 9 is a multiple of 3.

Not divisible by 6.

Check: \(225 = 6 \times 37 + 3\).

186: units digit 6 is even.

Digit sum \(1 + 8 + 6 = 15\) is a multiple of 3.

Divisible by 6.

Check: \(186 = 6 \times 31\).

64: units digit 4 is even.

Digit sum \(6 + 4 = 10\) is not a multiple of 3.

Not divisible by 6.

Check: \(64 = 6 \times 10 + 4\).

Why it works: \(6 = 2 \times 3\), and 2 and 3 have no common factor other than 1.

A number divisible by both 2 and 3 is divisible by their LCM, which is 6.

Yes. A number is divisible by 6 if and only if it is divisible by both 2 and 3. Only 186 is divisible by 6.
?In-text Question — Explain using prime factorisation why checking divisibility by 3 and 8 works for checking divisibility by 24, but checking divisibility by 4 and 6 is not sufficient for checking divisibility by 24.

The prime factorisation of 24 is \(24 = 2^3 \times 3\).

Why 3 and 8 work: \(8 = 2^3\).

A number divisible by 8 has \(2^3\) in its prime factorisation.

A number divisible by 3 has 3 in it.

So a number divisible by both has \(2^3 \times 3 = 24\) in its prime factorisation.

It is divisible by 24.

Also, 8 and 3 have no common prime factor, and \(\text{LCM}(8, 3) = 24\).

Why 4 and 6 are not enough: \(4 = 2^2\) and \(6 = 2 \times 3\).

A number divisible by both needs only \(2^2\) and \(3\), which is \(2^2 \times 3 = 12\).

It does not need the third factor 2.

Here \(\text{LCM}(4, 6) = 12\), not 24.

Example: 12 and 36 are divisible by both 4 and 6.

But \(12 \div 24\) and \(36 \div 24\) are not whole numbers.

24 = 2³ × 3 = 8 × 3, with 8 and 3 sharing no factor, so 3 and 8 work. But LCM(4, 6) = 12, so 4 and 6 only guarantee divisibility by 12.

Digital Roots

?In-text Question — Take a number. Add its digits repeatedly till you get a single-digit number. This single-digit number is called the digital root of the number. For example, the digital root of the number 489710 will be 2 (4 + 8 + 9 + 7 + 1 + 0 = 29, 2 + 9 = 11, 1 + 1 = 2). What property do you think this digital root will have? Recall that we did this while finding the divisibility shortcut for 9.

A number and the sum of its digits leave the same remainder when divided by 9.

Adding the digits again and again never changes this remainder.

So the digital root leaves the same remainder as the original number, when divided by 9.

Example: \(489710 = 9 \times 54412 + 2\), and its digital root is 2.

Property: if the remainder on division by 9 is 1, 2, \(\ldots\), 8, the digital root is that remainder.

If the number is a multiple of 9, the digital root is 9 (never 0, as long as the number is not 0).

The digital root of a number is its remainder when divided by 9. For multiples of 9 the digital root is 9.
?In-text Question — Between the numbers 600 and 700, which numbers have the digital root:
(i) 5,
(ii) 7,
(iii) 3?

A number \(6bc\) has digit sum \(6 + b + c\).

Its digital root is the remainder of this sum on division by 9.

(i) Digital root 5: \(6 + b + c\) is 14 or 23, so \(b + c = 8\) or \(17\).

608, 617, 626, 635, 644, 653, 662, 671, 680, 689, 698

(ii) Digital root 7: \(6 + b + c\) is 7 or 16, so \(b + c = 1\) or \(10\).

601, 610, 619, 628, 637, 646, 655, 664, 673, 682, 691

(iii) Digital root 3: \(6 + b + c\) is 12 or 21, so \(b + c = 6\) or \(15\).

606, 615, 624, 633, 642, 651, 660, 669, 678, 687, 696

(i) 608, 617, 626, 635, 644, 653, 662, 671, 680, 689, 698
(ii) 601, 610, 619, 628, 637, 646, 655, 664, 673, 682, 691
(iii) 606, 615, 624, 633, 642, 651, 660, 669, 678, 687, 696
MTMath Talk — Write the digital roots of any 12 consecutive numbers. What do you observe?

Take the 12 consecutive numbers 100, 101, \(\ldots\), 111.

Number100101102103104105106107108109110111
Digital root123456789123

Observations:

The digital roots go 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and then start again from 1.

Each number has a digital root 1 more than the number before it.

After 9 comes 1.

The pattern repeats after every 9 numbers.

Why: the digital root is the remainder on division by 9 (with 9 in place of 0).

The next number has a remainder 1 more.

After remainder 8 comes 0, which is written as 9.

The digital roots of consecutive numbers go 1, 2, …, 9 and repeat. Each is 1 more than the previous one, and 9 is followed by 1.
?In-text Question — We saw that the digital root of multiples of 9 is always 9. Now, find the digital roots of some consecutive multiples of
(i) 3,
(ii) 4, and
(iii) 6. Try to explain the patterns noticed.

(i) Multiples of 3: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, \(\ldots\)

Digital roots: 3, 6, 9, 3, 6, 9, 3, 6, 9, \(\ldots\)

(ii) Multiples of 4: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, \(\ldots\)

Digital roots: 4, 8, 3, 7, 2, 6, 1, 5, 9, \(\ldots\)

(iii) Multiples of 6: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, \(\ldots\)

Digital roots: 6, 3, 9, 6, 3, 9, 6, 3, 9, \(\ldots\)

Pattern: the roots repeat.

For 3 the block is 3, 6, 9.

For 4 the block is 4, 8, 3, 7, 2, 6, 1, 5, 9.

For 6 the block is 6, 3, 9.

Explanation: the digital root is the remainder on division by 9 (9 in place of 0).

Each step adds the same number to the previous multiple, so the remainder goes up by the same amount each time, going round the cycle \(1, 2, \ldots, 9\).

Multiples of 3: each step adds 3 to the root.

Starting at 3: 3, 6, 9, and then 12 gives 3 again.

Multiples of 6: each step adds 6, which is the same as going back 3 (since \(6 = 9 - 3\)).

So the roots are 6, 3, 9.

Multiples of 4: each step adds 4.

Since 4 and 9 have no common factor, the roots visit all nine values 1 to 9 before repeating.

(i) 3, 6, 9 repeating
(ii) 4, 8, 3, 7, 2, 6, 1, 5, 9 repeating
(iii) 6, 3, 9 repeating
?In-text Question — What are the digital roots of numbers that are 1 more than a multiple of 6? What do you notice?

Numbers that are 1 more than a multiple of 6: 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37, \(\ldots\)

Digital roots: 7, 4, 1, 7, 4, 1, 7, 4, 1, \(\ldots\)

Notice: the roots go 7, 4, 1 and repeat.

Explanation: the numbers \(6k\) have roots 6, 3, 9 in a cycle (see the previous question).

Adding 1 to each root gives 7, 4, 1 (where \(9 + 1 = 10\) is written as 1).

So the roots of \(6k + 1\) are 7, 4, 1 in a cycle.

Only these three values occur.

The digital roots are 7, 4, 1, 7, 4, 1, … They repeat in a block of 3.
MTMath Talk — I’m made of digits, each tiniest and odd, No shared ground with root #1 — how odd! My digits count, their sum, my root — All point to one bold number’s pursuit — The largest odd single-digit I proudly claim. What’s my number? What’s my name?

The largest odd single-digit number is 9.

The number of digits is 9, the sum of the digits is 9, and the digital root is 9.

Each digit is the smallest odd digit, which is 1.

So the number has nine digits, all equal to 1.

Digit sum \(= 1 \times 9 = 9\), and the digital root is 9, not 1.

(This is the “no shared ground with root 1”.)

The number is \(111111111\).

In the Indian system: 11,11,11,111, which is eleven crore eleven lakh eleven thousand one hundred eleven.

The number is 111111111 (eleven crore eleven lakh eleven thousand one hundred eleven).

Figure it Out — Set 3 (Page 131)

Four questions from page 131 of the textbook.

1The digital root of an 8-digit number is 5. What will be the digital root of 10 more than that number?

The digital root is the remainder on division by 9.

So the number is \(9m + 5\) for some whole number \(m\).

\(9m + 5 + 10 = 9m + 15\)

\(= 9m + 9 + 6\)

\(= 9(m + 1) + 6\)

The remainder is 6, so the digital root is 6.

Example: \(40000001\) has digital root 5.

Then \(40000011\) has digital root \(4 + 1 + 1 = 6\).

The digital root of the new number is 6.
2Write any number. Generate a sequence of numbers by repeatedly adding 11. What would be the digital roots of this sequence of numbers? Share your observations.

Start with 10 and keep adding 11.

Number102132435465768798109120
Digital root13579246813

Observations:

The roots go 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 4, 6, 8, and then repeat from the 10th term.

Each step increases the root by 2 (and 9 is followed by 2, since \(9 + 2 = 11\) gives 2).

Why: \(11 = 9 + 2\).

Adding 11 adds 2 to the remainder on division by 9.

All nine digital roots 1 to 9 appear once in every 9 terms, because 2 and 9 have no common factor.

The same happens whatever number we start with, only the starting root changes.

Each time we add 11, the digital root increases by 2. The roots repeat after 9 terms and take all values from 1 to 9.
3What will be the digital root of the number 9a + 36b + 13?

Here \(a\) and \(b\) are whole numbers.

\(9a + 36b + 13 = 9a + 36b + 9 + 4\)

\(= 9(a + 4b + 1) + 4\) (taking out 9 from \(9a\), \(36b\) and 9)

\(9(a + 4b + 1)\) is a multiple of 9.

So the number leaves remainder 4 when divided by 9.

Example: \(a = 1, b = 1\) gives \(9 + 36 + 13 = 58\), and its digital root is \(5 + 8 = 13 \to 4\).

The digital root is 4.
4Math Talk — Make conjectures by examining if there are any patterns or relations between
(i) the parity of a number and its digital root.
(ii) the digital root of a number and the remainder obtained when the number is divided by 3 or 9.

(i) Parity and digital root

Number101112132022272930
Even or oddEvenOddEvenOddEvenEvenOddOddEven
Digital root123424923

Even numbers 10, 12, 20, 22, 30 have digital roots 1, 3, 2, 4, 3.

Odd numbers 11, 13, 27, 29 have digital roots 2, 4, 9, 2.

Even numbers can have an odd root (10 has root 1) or an even root (20 has root 2).

Odd numbers can have an even root (11 has root 2) or an odd root (27 has root 9).

Conjecture: there is no relation between the parity of a number and its digital root.

(ii) Digital root and remainders

Write the number as \(9m + r\), where \(r\) is its digital root (\(r = 1, 2, \ldots, 9\)).

Division by 9: if \(r < 9\), the remainder is \(r\).

If \(r = 9\), the number is \(9(m + 1)\), so the remainder is 0.

Division by 3: \(9m\) is a multiple of 3, so the remainder is the remainder of \(r\) on division by 3.

Digital root123456789
Remainder on division by 3120120120
Remainder on division by 9123456780

Conjectures:

Digital root 3, 6 or 9 means the number is a multiple of 3.

Digital root 1, 4 or 7 means remainder 1 on division by 3.

Digital root 2, 5 or 8 means remainder 2.

Remainder on division by 9 equals the digital root, except that digital root 9 gives remainder 0.

(i) There is no relation between parity and digital root.
(ii) Remainder on division by 9 = digital root (0 if the root is 9). Remainder on division by 3 = remainder of the digital root on division by 3.

Digits in Disguise

?
In-text Question — Solve the cryptarithms given below. (Each letter stands for a digit, each digit is represented by at most one letter, and the first digit of a number is never 0.)
(i)
  A1
+ 1B
  B0
(ii)
  AB
+ 37
  6A
(iii)
  ON
  ON
+ ON
  PO
(iv)
  QR
  QR
+ QR
  PRR

(i) A1 + 1B = B0

Units column: \(1 + B\) must end in 0, so \(B = 9\) (\(1 + 9 = 10\)).

Write 0 and carry 1.

Tens column: \(A + 1 + 1 = B = 9\), so \(A = 7\).

Check: \(71 + 19 = 90\).

(ii) AB + 37 = 6A

Units column: \(B + 7\) ends in \(A\).

If there were no carry, \(A + 3 = 6\) would give \(A = 3\) and \(B + 7 = 3\), which is not possible.

So there is a carry: \(B + 7 = A + 10\) and \(A + 3 + 1 = 6\), giving \(A = 2\).

Then \(B + 7 = 12\), so \(B = 5\).

Check: \(25 + 37 = 62\).

(iii) ON + ON + ON = PO, that is, \(3 \times ON = PO\).

The product has 2 digits, so \(ON \le 33\).

The units digit of \(3N\) must be \(O\).

\(N = 1\): \(3N = 3\), so \(O = 3\).

\(31 \times 3 = 93\).

So \(P = 9\).

\(N = 4\): \(3N = 12\), so \(O = 2\).

\(24 \times 3 = 72\).

So \(P = 7\).

\(N = 7\): \(3N = 21\), so \(O = 1\).

\(17 \times 3 = 51\).

So \(P = 5\).

The other values of \(N\) give \(O = N\), \(O = 0\), or \(ON \times 3\) with 3 digits.

All three solutions satisfy the conditions, because the letters stand for different digits in each.

(iv) QR + QR + QR = PRR, that is, \(3 \times QR = PRR\).

Units digit: \(3R\) ends in \(R\), so \(R = 0\) or \(R = 5\).

If \(R = 0\): \(3 \times 10Q = 100P\) gives \(3Q = 10P\), which has no digit solution (with \(Q \neq 0\)).

If \(R = 5\): \(3(10Q + 5) = 100P + 55\), so \(30Q = 100P + 40\), that is, \(3Q = 10P + 4\).

\(P = 2\) gives \(3Q = 24\), so \(Q = 8\).

Check: \(85 \times 3 = 255\).

(i) A = 7, B = 9
(ii) A = 2, B = 5
(iii) (O, N, P) = (3, 1, 9), (2, 4, 7) or (1, 7, 5)
(iv) Q = 8, R = 5, P = 2
?In-text Question — (v) PQ × 8 = RS. Guna says, “Oh, this means a 2-digit number multiplied by 8 should give another 2-digit number. I know that 10 × 8 = 80. But the units digits of 10 and 80 are the same, which we don’t want. For the same reason PQ cannot be 11 as P and Q correspond to different digits. 12 × 8 = 96 fits all the conditions”. Can PQ be 13? Think.

No, PQ cannot be 13.

\(13 \times 8 = 104\), which has 3 digits.

But RS has only 2 digits.

For every 2-digit number greater than 12, the product with 8 is 104 or more, so it is a 3-digit number.

So PQ can only be 10, 11 or 12.

\(10 \times 8 = 80\): here \(Q = 0\) and \(S = 0\), so two different letters stand for the same digit.

Rejected.

\(11 \times 8 = 88\): here \(P = Q = 1\) (and \(R = S = 8\)), so different letters stand for the same digit.

Rejected.

\(12 \times 8 = 96\): \(P = 1,\ Q = 2,\ R = 9,\ S = 6\), all different.

Accepted.

No, 13 × 8 = 104 has 3 digits. The only solution is 12 × 8 = 96, with P = 1, Q = 2, R = 9, S = 6.
?In-text Question — Try this now: GH × H = 9K. This means a 2-digit number multiplied by a 1-digit number gives another 2-digit number in the 90s. Observe the letters corresponding to the units digits in this cryptarithm. Pick the solution to this question from the options given below: 11 × 9 = 99, 12 × 8 = 96, 46 × 2 = 92, 24 × 4 = 96, 47 × 2 = 94, 31 × 3 = 93, 16 × 6 = 96.

In \(GH \times H\), the 1-digit multiplier is the same as the units digit of the 2-digit number.

Also the three letters \(G, H, K\) must stand for different digits.

Check each option:

\(11 \times 9\): units digit of 11 is 1, not 9.

Rejected.

\(12 \times 8\): units digit of 12 is 2, not 8.

Rejected.

\(46 \times 2\): units digit of 46 is 6, not 2.

Rejected.

\(47 \times 2\): units digit of 47 is 7, not 2.

Rejected.

\(31 \times 3\): units digit of 31 is 1, not 3.

Rejected.

\(16 \times 6\): the units digit 6 matches the multiplier.

The product is 96, so \(K = 6 = H\).

But \(H\) and \(K\) must be different digits.

Rejected.

\(24 \times 4\): the units digit 4 matches the multiplier.

The product is 96, so \(G = 2\), \(H = 4\), \(K = 6\), all different.

Accepted.

GH × H = 9K is solved by 24 × 4 = 96, with G = 2, H = 4, K = 6.
?In-text Question — (vii) Here is one more: BYE × 6 = RAY. Anshu says, “Since the product is a 3-digit number, B can’t be 2 or more. If B = 2, i.e., 2 hundreds, the product will be more than 1200. So, B = 1.” What can you say about ‘Y’? What digits are possible/not possible?

Since \(B = 1\), the number BYE is \(100 + 10Y + E\).

Y cannot be 7 or more: if \(Y = 7\), then \(170 \times 6 = 1020\), which has 4 digits.

The product must have 3 digits, so \(BYE \le 166\).

So \(Y \le 6\).

Y is even: the units digit of the product is the units digit of \(6 \times E\).

\(6 \times E\) is always even, so \(Y\) is even.

So \(Y\) can only be 0, 2, 4 or 6.

Odd digits, and 8 and 9, are not possible.

Trying each value of Y:

\(Y = 0\): \(6E\) ends in 0, so \(E = 0\) or \(5\).

\(E = 0\) is the same as \(Y\), so \(E = 5\).

\(105 \times 6 = 630\), so \(R = 6\) and \(A = 3\).

The digits 1, 0, 5, 6, 3 are all different.

Accepted.

\(Y = 2\): \(6E\) ends in 2, so \(E = 2\) or \(7\).

\(E = 2\) is the same as \(Y\).

\(127 \times 6 = 762\) gives \(R = 7 = E\).

Rejected.

\(Y = 4\): \(6E\) ends in 4, so \(E = 4\) or \(9\).

\(E = 4\) is the same as \(Y\).

\(149 \times 6 = 894\) gives \(A = 9 = E\).

Rejected.

\(Y = 6\): \(6E\) ends in 6, so \(E = 1\) or \(6\).

\(E = 1\) is the same as \(B\), and \(E = 6\) is the same as \(Y\).

Rejected.

Y is even and at most 6, so Y can be 0, 2, 4 or 6, but not 7, 8, 9 or any odd digit. The only solution is 105 × 6 = 630, with B = 1, Y = 0, E = 5, R = 6, A = 3.
?In-text Question — Solve the following:
(i) UT × 3 = PUT
(ii) AB × 5 = BC
(iii) L2N × 2 = 2NP
(iv) XY × 4 = ZX
(v) PP × QQ = PRP
(vi) JK × 6 = KKK

(i) UT × 3 = PUT

Units digit: \(3T\) ends in \(T\), so \(T = 0\) or \(T = 5\).

If \(T = 5\): \(30U + 15 = 100P + 10U + 5\), so \(2U + 1 = 10P\).

Odd cannot equal even, so this is not possible.

If \(T = 0\): \(30U = 100P + 10U\), so \(20U = 100P\), that is, \(U = 5P\).

\(P = 1\) gives \(U = 5\).

Check: \(50 \times 3 = 150\).

(ii) AB × 5 = BC

The product has 2 digits, so \(AB \le 19\), and \(A = 1\).

\(5(10 + B) = 10B + C\), so \(50 = 5B + C\), that is, \(C = 50 - 5B\).

\(C\) is a digit, so \(50 - 5B \le 9\), which gives \(B \ge 9\).

So \(B = 9\) and \(C = 5\).

Check: \(19 \times 5 = 95\).

(iii) L2N × 2 = 2NP

The product starts with 2, so \(L2N \times 2\) lies between 200 and 299, so \(L2N\) lies between 100 and 149.

Hence \(L = 1\).

\(2(120 + N) = 200 + 10N + P\), so \(40 = 8N + P\).

\(N = 4\) gives \(P = 8\).

\(N = 5\) gives \(P = 0\).

(\(N \ge 6\) makes \(P\) negative, and \(N \le 3\) makes \(P\) more than 9.)

Check: \(124 \times 2 = 248\) and \(125 \times 2 = 250\).

(iv) XY × 4 = ZX

The product has 2 digits, so \(XY \le 24\).

\(4(10X + Y) = 10Z + X\), so \(39X + 4Y = 10Z\).

\(X = 1\): \(39 + 4Y\) is odd, so it cannot be a multiple of 10.

\(X = 2\): \(78 + 4Y\) must end in 0, so \(4Y\) ends in 2.

\(Y = 3\) or \(Y = 8\).

But \(XY \le 24\), so \(Y = 3\).

Then \(Z = 9\).

Check: \(23 \times 4 = 92\).

(v) PP × QQ = PRP

\(PP = 11P\) and \(QQ = 11Q\), so the product is \(121 \times P \times Q\).

This must be a 3-digit number, so \(P \times Q \le 8\).

Let \(m = P \times Q\).

Then \(121m\) is 242, 363, 484, 605, 726, 847, 968 for \(m = 2, 3, \ldots, 8\).

The first and last digits must both be \(P\).

This happens only for \(m = 2, 3, 4\), and then \(P = m\).

\(P = P \times Q\) gives \(Q = 1\).

So \(P = 2, 3\) or \(4\).

\(22 \times 11 = 242\), \(33 \times 11 = 363\), \(44 \times 11 = 484\).

(vi) JK × 6 = KKK

\(KKK = 111K\), so \(6 \times JK = 111K\), that is, \(JK = 18.5K\).

So \(K\) is even.

\(K = 2\): \(JK = 37\), which does not end in 2.

\(K = 4\): \(JK = 74\), which ends in 4.

This works.

\(K = 6\) and \(K = 8\) give \(JK = 111\) and \(148\), which are not 2-digit numbers.

Check: \(74 \times 6 = 444\).

(i) U = 5, T = 0, P = 1
(ii) A = 1, B = 9, C = 5
(iii) L = 1, N = 4, P = 8 or L = 1, N = 5, P = 0
(iv) X = 2, Y = 3, Z = 9
(v) (P, Q, R) = (2, 1, 4), (3, 1, 6) or (4, 1, 8)
(vi) J = 7, K = 4

Figure it Out — Set 4 (Pages 132–134)

Sixteen questions from page 132, page 133 and page 134 of the textbook.

1If 31z5 is a multiple of 9, where z is a digit, what is the value of z? Explain why there are two answers to this problem.

A number is a multiple of 9 if its digit sum is a multiple of 9.

Digit sum of 31z5 \(= 3 + 1 + z + 5 = 9 + z\).

\(9 + z\) must be a multiple of 9.

Since \(z\) is a digit, \(9 + z\) lies between 9 and 18.

The multiples of 9 in this range are 9 and 18.

\(9 + z = 9\) gives \(z = 0\).

\(9 + z = 18\) gives \(z = 9\).

Check: \(3105 = 9 \times 345\) and \(3195 = 9 \times 355\).

Why two answers: the digits 0 and 9 are 9 apart.

So both \(9 + 0\) and \(9 + 9\) are multiples of 9.

The next multiple, 27, would need \(z = 18\), which is not a digit.

z = 0 or z = 9.
2“I take a number that leaves a remainder of 8 when divided by 12. I take another number which is 4 short of a multiple of 12. Their sum will always be a multiple of 8”, claims Snehal. Examine his claim and justify your conclusion.

First number: \(a = 12n + 8\).

Second number: 4 short of a multiple of 12, so \(b = 12m - 4\).

\(a + b = 12n + 8 + 12m - 4\)

\(= 12(n + m) + 4\)

\(= 12k + 4\), where \(k = n + m\)

\(= 4(3k + 1)\)

This is a multiple of 8 only when \(3k + 1\) is even, that is, when \(k\) is odd.

Example where it is true: \(k = 1\): \(8 + 8 = 16\), a multiple of 8.

Example where it is false: \(k = 2\): \(8 + 20 = 28\), not a multiple of 8.

Snehal’s claim is not always true. The sum is 12k + 4, which is a multiple of 8 only when k is odd.
3When is the sum of two multiples of 3, a multiple of 6 and when is it not? Explain the different possible cases, and generalise the pattern.

Let the two multiples of 3 be \(3m\) and \(3n\).

\(3m + 3n = 3(m + n)\)

This is a multiple of 6 exactly when \(m + n\) is even.

Case 1: \(m\) and \(n\) both even.

Both numbers are multiples of 6.

Example: \(6 + 12 = 18\).

The sum is a multiple of 6.

Case 2: \(m\) and \(n\) both odd.

Both numbers are odd multiples of 3.

Example: \(3 + 9 = 12\).

The sum is a multiple of 6.

Case 3: one of \(m, n\) even and the other odd.

One number is a multiple of 6 and the other is an odd multiple of 3.

Example: \(6 + 9 = 15\).

The sum is not a multiple of 6.

The sum of two multiples of 3 is a multiple of 6 when both are multiples of 6 or both are odd multiples of 3. It is not a multiple of 6 when exactly one of them is a multiple of 6.
4Sreelatha says, “I have a number that is divisible by 9. If I reverse its digits, it will still be divisible by 9”.
(i) Examine if her conjecture is true for any multiple of 9.
(ii) Are any other digit shuffles possible such that the number formed is still a multiple of 9?

A number is divisible by 9 if and only if its digit sum is divisible by 9.

(i) Reversing the digits gives the same digits in a different order.

The digit sum does not change, so it is still a multiple of 9.

Example: \(486 = 9 \times 54\) and the reverse \(684 = 9 \times 76\).

Sreelatha’s conjecture is true for every multiple of 9.

(ii) Yes.

Any shuffle of the digits keeps the digit sum the same.

So every rearrangement of the digits of a multiple of 9 is again a multiple of 9.

Example: the digits of 486 can be arranged as 468, 648, 684, 846, 864, and all are multiples of 9.

(i) Yes, it is true for every multiple of 9.
(ii) Yes, every shuffle of the digits gives a multiple of 9, because the digit sum stays the same.
5If 48a23b is a multiple of 18, list all possible pairs of values for a and b.

\(18 = 2 \times 9\), and 2 and 9 have no common factor.

So the number must be divisible by both 2 and 9.

Divisible by 2: the units digit \(b\) is even, so \(b = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8\).

Divisible by 9: the digit sum \(4 + 8 + a + 2 + 3 + b = 17 + a + b\) is a multiple of 9.

\(a + b\) lies between 0 and 18, so \(17 + a + b\) lies between 17 and 35.

The only multiples of 9 here are 18 and 27.

\(17 + a + b = 18\) gives \(a + b = 1\): \(b = 0, a = 1\).

\(17 + a + b = 27\) gives \(a + b = 10\): with \(b\) even, \((a, b) = (2, 8), (4, 6), (6, 4), (8, 2)\).

(\(b = 0\) would need \(a = 10\), which is not a digit.)

Check: \(481230 = 18 \times 26735\) and \(482238 = 18 \times 26791\).

(a, b) = (1, 0), (2, 8), (4, 6), (6, 4) or (8, 2).
6If 3p7q8 is divisible by 44, list all possible pairs of values for p and q.

\(44 = 4 \times 11\), and 4 and 11 have no common factor.

So the number must be divisible by both 4 and 11.

Divisible by 4: the number \(q8\) must be divisible by 4.

\(q8 = 08, 28, 48, 68, 88\), so \(q = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8\).

Divisible by 11: digits from the units place are 8, \(q\), 7, \(p\), 3.

Sum of the digits at the 1st, 3rd, 5th places \(= 8 + 7 + 3 = 18\).

Sum of the digits at the 2nd and 4th places \(= q + p\).

The difference \(18 - (p + q)\) must be 0 or a multiple of 11.

\(p + q\) lies between 0 and 18, so the difference lies between 0 and 18.

Difference 0: \(p + q = 18\), so \(p = q = 9\).

But \(q\) must be even, so this is rejected.

Difference 11: \(p + q = 7\).

With \(q\) even: \((p, q) = (7, 0), (5, 2), (3, 4), (1, 6)\).

(\(q = 8\) would need \(p = -1\).)

Check: \(37708 = 44 \times 857\), \(35728 = 44 \times 812\), \(33748 = 44 \times 767\), \(31768 = 44 \times 722\).

(p, q) = (7, 0), (5, 2), (3, 4) or (1, 6).
7Try This — Find three consecutive numbers such that the first number is a multiple of 2, the second number is a multiple of 3, and the third number is a multiple of 4. Are there more such numbers? How often do they occur?

Let the numbers be \(n, n + 1, n + 2\).

\(n\) is a multiple of 2, \(n + 1\) is a multiple of 3, \(n + 2\) is a multiple of 4.

One set: 2, 3, 4.

Finding all of them: \(n + 1\) is a multiple of 3, so \(n\) is 1 less than a multiple of 3.

This is the same as \(n\) leaving remainder 2 when divided by 3.

\(n + 2\) is a multiple of 4, so \(n\) leaves remainder 2 when divided by 4.

\(n\) is a multiple of 2 and leaves remainder 2 on division by 4, which already holds.

So \(n - 2\) is a multiple of both 3 and 4, that is, a multiple of \(\text{LCM}(3, 4) = 12\).

\(n = 12k + 2\) for \(k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\)

The sets are 2, 3, 4;

14, 15, 16;

26, 27, 28;

38, 39, 40;

\(\ldots\)

Yes, there are more such sets. They occur at every 12 numbers: n = 12k + 2.
8Math Talk — Write five multiples of 36 between 45,000 and 47,000. Share your approach with the class.

\(36 = 4 \times 9\), and 4 and 9 have no common factor.

A number is a multiple of 36 if it is divisible by both 4 and 9.

Digit sum of 45000 is 9, and its last two digits are 00.

So 45000 is a multiple of 36: \(45000 = 36 \times 1250\).

The next multiples of 36 are found by adding 36 each time.

\(45000 + 36 = 45036\)

\(45036 + 36 = 45072\)

\(45072 + 36 = 45108\)

\(45108 + 36 = 45144\)

\(45144 + 36 = 45180\)

Check one: 45036 has last two digits 36, which is divisible by 4.

The digit sum is \(4 + 5 + 0 + 3 + 6 = 18\), a multiple of 9.

Five multiples of 36: 45036, 45072, 45108, 45144, 45180.
9The middle number in the sequence of 5 consecutive even numbers is 5p. Express the other four numbers in sequence in terms of p.

Consecutive even numbers differ by 2.

The numbers before 5p: \(5p - 2\) and \(5p - 4\).

The numbers after 5p: \(5p + 2\) and \(5p + 4\).

In order: \(5p - 4,\ 5p - 2,\ 5p,\ 5p + 2,\ 5p + 4\).

The sequence is 5p − 4, 5p − 2, 5p, 5p + 2, 5p + 4.
10Write a 6-digit number that it is divisible by 15, such that when the digits are reversed, it is divisible by 6.

Let the number be \(abcdef\).

Divisible by 15 means divisible by 3 and 5.

So \(f = 0\) or \(f = 5\), and the digit sum is a multiple of 3.

If \(f = 0\), the reversed number starts with 0 and is not a 6-digit number.

So take \(f = 5\).

The reversed number is \(fedcba\).

For it to be divisible by 6, it must be even and its digit sum must be a multiple of 3.

The digit sum is unchanged by reversal, so it is already a multiple of 3.

It is even if its units digit \(a\) is even.

So \(a = 2, 4, 6\) or \(8\).

Choose \(a = 2\), \(f = 5\), and fill the middle digits to make the digit sum a multiple of 3: \(2 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 5 = 9\).

The number is 200025.

Check: \(200025 = 15 \times 13335\).

Reversed: \(520002 = 6 \times 86667\).

One such number is 200025. Others are 200055, 200085 and 202005.
11Deepak claims, “There are some multiples of 11 which, when doubled, are still multiples of 11. But other multiples of 11 don’t remain multiples of 11 when doubled”. Examine if his conjecture is true; explain your conclusion.

Let \(n\) be any multiple of 11, so \(n = 11k\).

Doubling gives \(2n = 22k\).

\(= 11 \times 2k\)

This is a multiple of 11 for every value of \(k\).

Example: \(11 \times 2 = 22\), which is a multiple of 11.

Example: \(33 \times 2 = 66 = 11 \times 6\), which is a multiple of 11.

Deepak’s conjecture is false. Every multiple of 11, when doubled, is still a multiple of 11.
12Determine whether the statements below are ‘Always True’, ‘Sometimes True’, or ‘Never True’. Explain your reasoning.
(i) The product of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 3 is a multiple of 9.
(ii) The sum of three consecutive even numbers will be divisible by 6.
(iii) If abcdef is a multiple of 6, then badcef will be a multiple of 6.
(iv) 8 (7b – 3) – 4 (11b + 1) is a multiple of 12.

(i) Always true.

Let the numbers be \(6a\) and \(3b\).

\(6a \times 3b = 18ab = 9 \times 2ab\)

This is a multiple of 9.

(ii) Always true.

Let the three consecutive even numbers be \(2n, 2n + 2, 2n + 4\).

Sum \(= 6n + 6 = 6(n + 1)\)

This is a multiple of 6.

(iii) Always true.

\(abcdef\) is a multiple of 6, so it is even and its digit sum is a multiple of 3.

In \(badcef\), the digits \(a, b\) are swapped and \(c, d\) are swapped.

The digit sum is the same, so it is a multiple of 3.

The units digit \(f\) is unchanged, so the number is still even.

So \(badcef\) is a multiple of 6.

(iv) Never true.

\(8(7b - 3) - 4(11b + 1) = 56b - 24 - 44b - 4\)

\(= 12b - 28\)

\(= 12(b - 3) + 8\)

The remainder on division by 12 is always 8, never 0.

(i) Always true
(ii) Always true
(iii) Always true
(iv) Never true
13Choose any 3 numbers. When is their sum divisible by 3? Explore all possible cases and generalise.

When a number is divided by 3, the remainder is 0, 1 or 2.

Write the three numbers as \(3a + r_1\), \(3b + r_2\), \(3c + r_3\), where each remainder \(r\) is 0, 1 or 2.

Sum \(= 3(a + b + c) + (r_1 + r_2 + r_3)\)

The sum is divisible by 3 exactly when \(r_1 + r_2 + r_3\) is divisible by 3, that is, 0, 3 or 6.

Case 1: all remainders 0.

\(0 + 0 + 0 = 0\).

Divisible.

Example: \(3 + 6 + 9 = 18\).

Case 2: all remainders 1.

\(1 + 1 + 1 = 3\).

Divisible.

Example: \(1 + 4 + 7 = 12\).

Case 3: all remainders 2.

\(2 + 2 + 2 = 6\).

Divisible.

Example: \(2 + 5 + 8 = 15\).

Case 4: remainders 0, 1, 2 (all different).

\(0 + 1 + 2 = 3\).

Divisible.

Example: \(3 + 4 + 5 = 12\).

All other cases give a remainder sum of 1, 2, 4 or 5, so the sum is not divisible by 3.

Example: remainders 0, 0, 1 give \(3 + 6 + 4 = 13\), not divisible by 3.

The sum of three numbers is divisible by 3 when their remainders on division by 3 are all the same, or all different (0, 1 and 2). Otherwise it is not.
14Is the product of two consecutive integers always multiple of 2? Why? What about the product of three consecutive integers? Is it always a multiple of 6? Why or why not? What can you say about the product of 4 consecutive integers? What about the product of five consecutive integers?

Two consecutive integers: one of them is even.

A product with an even factor is even.

So the product is always a multiple of 2.

Three consecutive integers: one of them is a multiple of 3 (every third integer is), and at least one is even.

So the product is a multiple of 2 and of 3.

Since 2 and 3 have no common factor, it is a multiple of \(2 \times 3 = 6\).

Example: \(4 \times 5 \times 6 = 120 = 6 \times 20\).

Four consecutive integers: one is a multiple of 3.

Two are even, and one of these two is a multiple of 4.

So the product has the factors \(4 \times 2 = 8\) from the even numbers, and 3.

8 and 3 have no common factor, so the product is a multiple of \(8 \times 3 = 24\).

Example: \(1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24\).

Five consecutive integers: the product of the first four is already a multiple of 24 (among any four consecutive of them), and one of the five is a multiple of 5.

24 and 5 have no common factor, so the product is a multiple of \(24 \times 5 = 120\).

Example: \(1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times 5 = 120\).

2 consecutive integers: multiple of 2. 3 consecutive: multiple of 6. 4 consecutive: multiple of 24. 5 consecutive: multiple of 120.
15Solve the cryptarithms —
(i) EF × E = GGG
(ii) WOW × 5 = MEOW

(i) EF × E = GGG

\(GGG = 111G = 3 \times 37 \times G\).

So the product is a multiple of 37.

37 is prime, so 37 divides \(EF\) or \(E\).

\(E\) is a single digit, so 37 divides \(EF\).

The 2-digit multiples of 37 are 37 and 74.

\(EF = 37\): \(37 \times 3 = 111\).

This works, with \(G = 1\).

\(EF = 74\): \(74 \times 7 = 518\).

This is not of the form \(GGG\).

Check: \(37 \times 3 = 111\).

(ii) WOW × 5 = MEOW

Units digit: \(5W\) ends in \(W\).

\(W \neq 0\) (first digit), so \(W = 5\).

\(WOW = 5O5 = 505 + 10O\).

\(5 \times (505 + 10O) = 2525 + 50O\), and its tens digit must be \(O\).

\(O = 0\): 2525, tens digit 2.

No.

\(O = 1\): 2575, tens digit 7.

No.

\(O = 2\): 2625, tens digit 2.

Yes, but then \(M = 2 = O\), and two letters cannot stand for the same digit.

No.

\(O = 3\): 2675 (7).

No.

\(O = 4\): 2725 (2).

No.

\(O = 6\): 2825 (2).

No.

\(O = 7\): 2875, tens digit 7.

Yes, with \(M = 2\), \(E = 8\), all different.

\(O = 8\): 2925 (2).

No.

\(O = 9\): 2975 (7).

No.

(\(O = 5\) is not allowed, since \(W = 5\).)

Check: \(575 \times 5 = 2875\).

(i) E = 3, F = 7, G = 1 (37 × 3 = 111)
(ii) W = 5, O = 7, M = 2, E = 8 (575 × 5 = 2875)
16
Which of the following Venn diagrams captures the relationship between the multiples of 4, 8, and 32?
4832
(i)
4832
(ii)
3284
(iii)
4832
(iv)

Multiples of 32 and multiples of 8: \(32 = 8 \times 4\), so every multiple of 32 is a multiple of 8.

But not every multiple of 8 is a multiple of 32.

For example, 8 is a multiple of 8 but not of 32.

So multiples of 32 lie inside multiples of 8.

Multiples of 8 and multiples of 4: \(8 = 4 \times 2\), so every multiple of 8 is a multiple of 4.

But not every multiple of 4 is a multiple of 8.

For example, 4 is a multiple of 4 but not of 8.

So multiples of 8 lie inside multiples of 4.

Together: multiples of 32 are inside multiples of 8, which are inside multiples of 4.

This needs three nested circles: the largest for multiples of 4, the middle for multiples of 8, the smallest for multiples of 32.

The last diagram, option iv, shows exactly this: the outer circle is multiples of 4, the middle one is multiples of 8, and the inner one is multiples of 32.

In the other diagrams the circles are not nested in this order, so they do not match.

Option (iv)

Puzzle Time — Navakankari

Navakankari

Navakankari, also known as Sālu Mane Āṭa, Chār-Pār, or Navkakri, is a traditional Indian board game that is the same as ‘Nine Men’s Morris’ or ‘Mills in the West’. It is a strategy game for two players where the goal is to form lines of three pawns to eliminate the opponent’s pawns or block their movement.

The Navakankari board: 24 marked intersections

Gameplay

  1. Each player starts with 9 pawns. The players take turns in placing their pawns on the marked intersections. An intersection can have at most one pawn.
  2. Once all the pawns are placed, the players take turns to move one of their pawns to adjacent empty intersections to form lines of three. The line can be horizontal or vertical.
  3. Once a player makes a line with their pawns they can remove any one of the opponent’s pawns as long as it is not a part of one of their lines.

A player wins if the opponent has less than 3 pawns or is unable to make a move.

Continue with Chapter 6

Move on to We Distribute, Yet Things Multiply next.

© Boundless Maths — Free CBSE Class 8–12 NCERT Solutions, Formula Cards & Question Banks.
Expert CBSE Coaching · Class 9–12